#1. Anti-Drone Activism Begins

 
                  Conor Freidersdorf starts writes about a man named Phillip Steele who starts a movement in his city, for hunting domestic drones. The US citizens are tarting to fear the constant vigilance the government is implying. Yet its not only the vigilance, but also the constant nuclear presence and proximity. Conor gives his opinion on this and drops in on giving a suggestion on what to do against it. Government and politics start being the topic, but he does not loos too much focus because he goes right back to talking about vigilance and that the FBI needs a warrant to use drones.
                 In my personal opinion, Conor is somewhat affective because he warns people about the drones and presents a solution. yet there where brief moment when he went off the main topic. Conor created lots of small branches, and that got a little confusing to understand. Yet the way he wrote was smooth and clear to understand. I was interested in it because of the information it gave, but again, the article was somewhat confusing. He could have presented his article in one big log instead of small branches allover.


http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/07/local-anti-drone-activism-begins-if-they-fly-in-town-we-will-shoot-them-down/278198/