The essay, which is written by the editorial board and not a specific person, talks about the results of the re-establishment of relations between Iran and the major powers and specially the United States. According to the article, while it does not guarantee complete peace among the countries, the nuclear deal provides does make the world safer, even if it is for a while. The deal is supposed to last six months, and while it is a short period of time, the countries must use this time to obtain a permanent deal that would prohibit the use of nuclear weapons. The article also describes how Iran is allowed to enrich 5% of its Uranium, which isn't appropriate for military use, but only energy.
The article is written in a informational, formal tone, which fits perfectly its topic. Also, it does not show personal opinion, since it doesn't fit the formal tone it possess and also because the article is not written by a specific person. The author(s) provide enough background information to begin the essay and present its topic. Following it explain its effects in both the world and Iran. The essay explains how the country was affected by the deal, even explaining how much they can enrich their Uranium and for what purpose it can be used. Wrapping up the article, it presents the possible actions that will be taken if the deal is not followed, and the reactions of other countries in the middle east.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/25/opinion/getting-to-yes-with-iran.html?hp&rref=opinion/international&_r=0
No comments:
Post a Comment