In this article Moisés Naim, a contributing editor at The Atlantic, writes on the pending consequences the secession of certain European countries from the world has had on European projects and on the continent itself. He begins his article by defining the symptoms of clinical depressions, where he compares the despair and lack of motivation in depression patients with countries in economic recession. He relates to his personal experience in countries such as Italy and Spain of which he states," I also felt more than ever before that Europeans have fallen out of love with Europe-or, more precisely, with the idea of building a Europe-wide Union." He continues by stating that these countries have been withdrawing from activity within Europe and the world, they have also turned an eye to world events and concerned themselves with internal affairs. Naim gives an example about an economic breakthrough by the Chinese Communist Party which would benefit both Spain and Italy, yet the two countries give no sign of awareness other than to their own internal interests. Furthermore, Naim states that these countries are disinterested with European affairs and with the EU. The author presents evidence that suggests that more than two thirds of the European population believe that the EU has no voice in its decisions and does not promote any promise for future economic improvements in Europe. The author continues by stating the flaws of the EU, especially those under scrutiny by struggling European countries, which have provided reason for doubt in the system. Although it may present controversy, the European project must undergo change to be beneficial to Europe. The author proposes that to do so the continent must integrate and have leaders which can convince the European population that integration will benefit them and their families.
In this article, the author presents a predominantly informative work with the purpose of informing the reader of the depth in which Europe finds itself trapped in economic depression. His essay is to the point and proficient in establishing his points, he is capable of enticing the reader even though the subject may be foreign. His easy-going, relaxed tone in many places is overlapped by a seriousness which allows him to emphasize the decay of European nations while providing hope of a better future. His examples help him promote this tone and his purpose by introducing personal experiences which allow the reader to understand the state in which European countries find themselves in and the controversy which has been introduced by their 'secession' from world affairs. The flow of the article, thus, is well-established as it follows the main point of the essay throughout. Naim uses different organizational patterns throughout his essay to emphasize different aspects of his description, such as the definition he gives in the beginning of his essay. The image used in this article is not well placed because it does not portray the essence of the article but rather confuses the reader by presenting a protest which may not be familiar to the reader. Nevertheless, his article is well written, it establishes his main point and is able to supply enough information to support his claims and to create an idea in the reader's mind of current events. The author also proposes to the end of his article a way in which the situation may be solved, providing space for the reader to take action or create their own beliefs about the future of Europe and the EU.
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/11/when-youve-lost-europeans-youve-lost-europe/281928/
No comments:
Post a Comment