James Hamblin,
The Atlantic's Health editor, writes
about the increasing usage of electronic cigarettes by students. He explains
what an e-cigarette is and tells the reason why it is becoming so popular. It
has been seen through research that e-cigarettes are safer than normal
cigarettes considering the health issues. Hamblin explains that is why there
has been an increase in the number of students that use e-cigarettes. The author
then shares that he disapproves of what is happening, but also that he thinks
it is inevitable that children will be introduced to nicotine. He ends by
questioning whether e-cigarettes are actually bad. Are they “good because it
encourages adults to use e-cigarettes instead of [actual] smoking, or bad
because it implies to kids that they're cool to use them?”
The author
does a great job in providing good backup information, but sometimes fails to
stay consistent with the way he writes for his audience. In his writing, Hamblin
includes statistics and quotes from very important people that study the
e-cigarette phenomenon, from the CDC director to a professor of health
behavior. He does a good job in citing reliable sources from where all the
information he used was taken from. The author writes mainly for an audience of
adults, clearly seen when he addresses them in the second paragraph, “in case
you're not among the six percent of adults who've tried them…” Throughout the
article, Hamblin uses an informal style of writing since he is talking to an average
adult audience. By providing his own personal opinion on the matter, he also
creates an intimacy with the reader. However, he does add in complex terminology
that is sometimes confusing. It does not fit in to the specific style of
writing Hamblin uses in this particular article.
background; not backup. adult audience; avoid use of "of"s (hahaha). Abundant adjectives are good, should have varied sentence structure more. Didn't need to use "[actual]".
ReplyDelete