Your summaries was complete and concise; I got a good understanding of the book, even though the summary wasn't that long (really, I'm impressed; I can't summarize like that, I write way too much). You put a bit more thought into the report for Into Thin Air, meaning that you added your opinion on the book more than you did for the Salt report. But then again, a 375-page book about an expedition to Mt. Everest is probably more exciting than a 450-page book on salt. Your review for Into Thin Air made me actually want to read it, wheras after I read about Salt, I decided not to read it (though the information about salt itself is quite interesting, I don't like really detailed history books, having read one myself). The Salt report had some grammar and punctuation mistakes, but the Into Thin Air report didn't seem to have as much.
Overall, in liew of thy report, I doth declare: Good show!
There were no grammar mistakes. Or was?
ReplyDelete