7.UK's decision against Syria military action welcomed

"Christian Aid has embraced the UK government's decision not to take part in military action against Syria."  David Cameron asked for a military action to take part in this problem with Syria after their brutal response including chemical weapons. However, the Prime Minister's solution was rejected in the Parliament. The Parliament decided to solve this problem by finding political solution to the conflict. Its decision has "opened the door for the UK Government " to work in "promoting peaceful alternatives to military action."Janet Symes, Head of Middle East at Christian Aid, said that the UK Government can bring political settlement by talking to all the parties at the Geneva peace talks and come up with ideas that "can bring the conflict to an end," she said."The UK government has already and will continue to played an important role in the humanitarian effort to assist Syrian people.

So far, I have read many articles by "New York Time" and "The Economist." Different from these, "Christian today's" articles are shorter than the others, which makes it hard to evaluate. The author's tone is very neutral, in a way that it doesn't take a clear side of the issue. The purpose of the article is to inform UK's step up "in promoting peaceful alternatives to military action in Syria." The author lays out the fact that Christian Aid has welcomed the UK government not to take military action towards Syria, and to put efforts to find a political solution to the conflict instead. Nevertheless, the article is hard to understand because of the lack of flow within the short paragraphs. 

http://www.christiantoday.com/article/uks.decision.against.syria.military.action.welcomed/33804.htm